JAMA | 2021

Counseling and Behavioral Interventions for Healthy Weight and Weight Gain in Pregnancy: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Importance\nCounseling and active behavioral interventions to limit excess gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy may improve health outcomes for women and infants. The 2009 National Academy of Medicine (NAM; formerly the Institute of Medicine) recommendations for healthy GWG vary according to prepregnancy weight category.\n\n\nObjective\nTo review and synthesize the evidence on benefits and harms of behavioral interventions to promote healthy weight gain during pregnancy to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.\n\n\nData Sources\nOvid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library to March 2020, with surveillance through February 2021.\n\n\nStudy Selection\nRandomized clinical trials and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies focused on diet, exercise, and/or behavioral counseling interventions on GWG.\n\n\nData Extraction and Synthesis\nIndependent data abstraction and study quality rating with dual review.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nGestational weight-related outcomes; maternal and infant morbidity and mortality; harms.\n\n\nResults\nSixty-eight studies (N\u2009=\u200925\u202f789) were included. Sixty-seven studies evaluated interventions during pregnancy, and 1 evaluated an intervention prior to pregnancy. GWG interventions were associated with reductions in risk of gestational diabetes (43 trials, n\u2009=\u200919\u202f752; relative risk [RR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95]; absolute risk difference [ARD], -1.6%) and emergency cesarean delivery (14 trials, n\u2009=\u20097520; RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.96]; ARD, -2.4%). There was no significant association between GWG interventions and risk of gestational hypertension, cesarean delivery, or preeclampsia. GWG interventions were associated with decreased risk of macrosomia (25 trials, n\u2009=\u200913\u202f990; RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92]; ARD, -1.9%) and large for gestational age (26 trials, n\u2009=\u200913\u202f000; RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99]; ARD, -1.3%) but were not associated with preterm birth. Intervention participants experienced reduced weight gain across all prepregnancy weight categories (55 trials, n\u2009=\u200920\u202f090; pooled mean difference, -1.02 kg [95% CI, -1.30 to -0.75]) and demonstrated lower likelihood of GWG in excess of NAM recommendations (39 trials, n\u2009=\u200914\u202f271; RR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89]; ARD, -7.6%). GWG interventions were associated with reduced postpartum weight retention at 12 months (10 trials, n\u2009=\u20093957; mean difference, -0.63 kg [95% CI, -1.44 to -0.01]). Data on harms were limited.\n\n\nConclusions and Relevance\nCounseling and active behavioral interventions to limit GWG were associated with decreased risk of gestational diabetes, emergency cesarean delivery, macrosomia, and large for gestational age. GWG interventions were also associated with modest reductions in mean GWG and decreased likelihood of exceeding NAM recommendations for GWG.

Volume 325 20
Pages \n 2094-2109\n
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.4230
Language English
Journal JAMA

Full Text