Cancer medicine | 2021

Lymph node metastases >5 and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.30 of differentiated thyroid cancer predict response to radioactive iodine.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


PURPOSE\nThe study was designed to elucidate the predictive value of the number of lymph node metastases (LNMs) and lymph node ratio (LNR) for response to therapy restratification system (RTRS).\n\n\nMETHODS\nFrom December 2015 to December 2019, 1228 patients who accepted radioactive iodine (RAI) were collected in the study. After 6-8\xa0months, response to RAI was evaluated as complete response (excellent response) and incomplete response (indeterminate, biochemical, and structural incomplete response). The study developed classification tree to determine the optimum LNMs and LNR that predicted response to RAI. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were further analyzed to find independent factors of response to RAI.\n\n\nRESULT\nThe mean age of patients was 44\xa0±\xa012 and 71.09% (873/1228) were females. The best cutoff value of LNMs to affect RAI treatment response determined by classification tree was 5. Further in 388 patients with LNMs >5, the best cutoff value of LNR to affect RAI treatment response determined by classification tree was 0.30. With multivariate analysis, the study found that LNMs (>5), gender, lymph node dissection, and American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification were independent predictors of response to RAI for all 1228 patients; and LNR (>0.30), gender, and ATA risk classification for 388 patients with LNMs >5. The sensitivity analysis indicated that whether patients with LNM or not were included, the multivariate logistic regression model was kept stable. On subgroup analysis, no significant interactions were observed between the effect of LNMs/LNR and gender, N stage, ATA risk classification, lymph node dissection, or T stage.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWith classification tree, the study found that LNMs and LNR could predict initial response to RAI, and their optimal cutoff values were 5 and 0.30, separately.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1002/cam4.4288
Language English
Journal Cancer medicine

Full Text