Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and doxorubicin in thyroid cancer: A prospective phase 2 trial.

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nThe use of external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced nonanaplastic thyroid cancer remains controversial. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced thyroid cancer.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe authors conducted a nonrandomized phase 2 trial of IMRT with or without concurrent doxorubicin in patients with gross residual or unresectable nonanaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01882816). The primary end point was 2-year locoregional progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), safety, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty-seven patients were enrolled: 12 (44.4%) with unresectable disease and 15 (55.6%) with gross residual disease. The median follow-up was 45.6\xa0months (interquartile range, 42.0-51.6\xa0months); the 2-year cumulative incidences of locoregional PFS and OS were 15.2% and 77.3%, respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher acute and late toxicities was 33.4%.. There were no significant functional differences 12\xa0months after treatment (assessed objectively by the modified barium swallow study). Patient-reported quality of life in the experimental group was initially lower but returned to the baseline after 6\xa0months and improved thereafter. In a post hoc analysis, concurrent chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (CC-IMRT) resulted in significantly less locoregional failure at 2\xa0years (no failure vs 50%; P\xa0=\xa0.001), with higher rates of grade 2 or higher acute dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia but no difference in long-term toxicity, functionality, or patient-reported quality of life.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn light of the excellent locoregional control rates achieved with CC-IMRT and its acceptable toxicity profile as confirmed by functional assessments and patient-reported outcomes, CC-IMRT may be preferred over IMRT alone.