PD‐(L)1 inhibitors vs. chemotherapy vs. their combination in front‐line treatment for NSCLC: An indirect comparison

Abstract

We comprehensively compared the therapeutic effects and safety of PD‐1/L1 antibodies (I), chemotherapy (C) or their combination (I\u2009+\u2009C) as first‐line treatments for advanced NSCLC. Online databases were searched to identify RCTs. Survival outcomes and safety events were pooled by indirect treatment comparison. Main subgroup analyses were conducted according to PD‐L1 expression. A total of 11 RCTs involving 6,731 patients were included. Overall, PD‐1/L1 inhibitors showed no difference to chemotherapy in PFS (HR 0.90, 0.65–1.24) and OS (HR 0.84, 0.64–1.09), while I\u2009+\u2009C was superior to chemotherapy both in PFS (HR 0.64, 0.58–0.71) and OS (HR 0.74, 0.62–0.89). I\u2009+\u2009C also showed advantages over PD‐1/L1 in PFS (HR 0.71, 0.51–0.99) but not OS (HR 0.88, 0.64–1.22). In the PD‐L1\u2009<\u20091% subgroup, I\u2009+\u2009C was beneficial both in OS (HR 0.78, 0.67–0.90) and PFS (HR 0.72, 0.65–0.80) than chemotherapy. In PD‐L1\u2009≥\u200950% population, PD‐1/L1 had longer OS than chemotherapy (HR 0.71, 0.60–0.84); I\u2009+\u2009C also had longer OS (HR 0.61, 0.49–0.77) and PFS (HR 0.41,0.34–0.49) than chemotherapy. In indirect analysis (PD‐L1\u2009≥\u200950%), I\u2009+\u2009C was superior to PD‐1/L1 in terms of PFS (HR 0.54, 0.35–0.82), but not OS (HR 0.86, 0.65–1.14). Both treatment‐related and immune‐mediated adverse events occurred most frequently in the combination therapy group. We suggest that a combination regimen is preferable as first‐line treatment for NSCLC patients with different PD‐L1 expression, in the meanwhile, in cautious of side effects.