Journal of clinical apheresis | 2021

Nationwide practices in the use of central venous catheters for therapeutic plasma exchange in the inpatient setting.

 
 
 
 

Abstract


INTRODUCTION\nTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is often impacted by difficulties in obtaining an adequate and safe vascular access. This study evaluated the rates, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes associated with central venous catheter (CVC) use during the inpatient TPE procedures.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe Nationwide Readmissions Database, 2016 to 2017 was used to identify hospitalizations with TPE with and without CVC insertion.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDuring the study period, there were 35\u2009429 hospitalizations with TPE (pediatric 6.1%, mean\u2009±\u2009standard deviation (SD) age 50.9\u2009±\u200920.0\u2009years, female 52.7%). CVC insertion was documented in 24\u2009414 (73.4%) adult and 1596 (73.5%) pediatric hospitalizations. In pediatric patients, age >15\u2009years, higher disease severity, and private insurance were associated with higher odds of CVC insertion. In adults, female sex, obesity, concurrent hemodialysis, and higher disease severity were associated with CVC insertion. Adults with private insurance and both adult and pediatric hospitalizations at the teaching hospitals had lower odds of CVC placement. All patients with CVC insertion had longer length of hospital stay, and adults with CVC insertion also had higher hospital charges, higher in-hospital mortality, and lower likelihood of being discharged to home.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCVC insertion is performed for the majority of inpatient TPE procedures and CVC use appears to correlate with worse clinical outcomes.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1002/jca.21929
Language English
Journal Journal of clinical apheresis

Full Text