Examining the impact of small bowel resection procedure timing in patients with blunt traumatic injury: a propensity-matched analysis

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of small bowel resection in small bowel injury on patients’ outcomes. Methods This study was performed using data from patients included in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007–2010) who sustained blunt injuries and underwent a small bowel resection (SBR) within 24\xa0h of arrival to the hospital. The patients’ characteristics and outcomes were compared between two groups: SBR within 4\xa0h (Group 1) and SBR between 4 and 24\xa0h (Group 2) using Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. However, in an attempt to better balance the groups, propensity score matching was performed using baseline characteristics and a follow-up paired analysis was performed using McNemar, Stuart-Maxwell, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results A total of 1774 patients qualified for the study. Of those, 1,292 (72.8%) patients underwent SBR within 4\xa0h and 482 (27.2%) underwent SBR between 4 and 24\xa0h after arrival. There were significant baseline differences between the two groups regarding Injury Severity Score (ISS) [Median (IQR)19 (10, 29) vs 14 (9, 25), P \u2009<\u20090.001], Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) [15 (13, 15) vs 15 (15, 15), P \u2009<\u20090.001] and the proportion of patients with an initial systolic blood pressure (SBP)\u2009<\u200990\xa0mmHg (18.3% vs 8.7%, P \u2009<\u20090.001). Given these clear differences, 482 patients from each group were pair-matched using propensity score matching on age, sex, race, ISS, GCS, and SBP. After matching, there were no significant differences observed in the matching variables, patient mortality rate (8.3% vs 7.9%, P \u2009=\u20090.90), or discharge disposition (home with no services: 63.1% vs 64.9%, P \u2009=\u20090.90); however, there was a significantly shorter hospital length of stay for those patients in Group 1 compared to Group 2 [9 (6, 15) vs 10 (7, 19), P \u2009=\u20090.03]. Conclusion More than 70% of the patient cases examined underwent SBR within 4\xa0h of hospital arrival. However, there were no significant differences identified in the mortality rate or the discharge disposition regardless of the timing of the SBR (≤\u20094 vs >\u20094–24\xa0h). However, the patients whose SBR was performed within 4\xa0h of arrival had a lower hospital length of stay when compared with those whose procedure was delayed.