[The anesthesiological questionnaire for patients in the outpatient context : Investigations on patient state of health after outpatient operations using the anesthesiological questionnaire for patients].

Abstract

BACKGROUND\nThe evaluation of German postanesthesia questionnaires is often restricted to inpatient medical care. The anesthesiological questionnaire for patients (ANP) has previously been validated only after medical care of inpatients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity of the ANP in the context of outpatient surgery and anesthesia.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from 4547\xa0patients (mean age 18-89\u202fyears, sex: m/f, 55%/45%), scheduled for ambulatory orthopedic and trauma surgery, were analyzed. All patients received a\xa0standard induction of anesthesia with propofol, sufentanil and 4\u202fmg dexamethasone. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved with a\xa0balanced technique comprising volatile anesthesia (either sevoflurane or desflurane) and sufentanil. In addition, patients undergoing operations on the anterior cruciate ligament received a\xa0femoral nerve block with 12-15\u202fml 0.5% ropivacaine. Of the patients 13% remained in hospital overnight as a\xa0result of complex operations (combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament repair, hip arthroscopy and 10% of those undergoing shoulder operations). Before discharge from the recovery room, patients were asked to answer questions with respect to postoperative symptoms 1h after anesthesia (ESNA 19\xa0items), at the time of interview (ABZ 17\xa0items) and about overall patient satisfaction (10\xa0items). These results were matched with the type of procedure and time data from the patient administration system. All data were analyzed descriptively using parametrical tests.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt both time points, pain in the area of the operation was the predominant symptom (ESNA: 77,1%; ABZ: 74,3%). Pain after shoulder arthroscopy was more severe compared to knee arthroscopy, both with and without repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Most of the adverse symptoms decreased significantly (p\u202f≤\u202f0.001) with time, demonstrating progressive recovery of the patient. Patient discomfort was more likely to occur in female than in male patients, and female patients were more likely to be dissatisfied with the progress of recovery. The risk of experiencing adverse symptoms after anesthesia was higher for female than for male patients; this was most apparent for feeling cold (odds ratio, OR 4.08) and nausea and vomiting (OR 3.45). Younger patients (18-40\u202fyears) were more likely to express discomfort than both groups of older patients (41-60\u202fyears and 61-89\u202fyears). Accordingly, younger patients had lower satisfaction levels with respect to both anesthesia and overall perioperative care, and the progress of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were linked to younger age, female sex, and longer procedure times (>40\u202fmin).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe individual analyses delivered plausible results, which support the validity of the ANP. The ANP may also be used for assessment of postoperative discomfort and patient satisfaction in the setting of outpatient surgery. In view of the short time interval between the two measurement points, the ANP for outpatients could in future be reduced to a\xa0single postoperative questionnaire.