Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis The posterior approach to sacrospinous hysteropexy has been well studied but little is known about the anterior approach. This study assessed the efficacy and complications of an anterior approach to sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy with apical repair. We hypothesized that anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy has similar efficacy and fewer complications. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent native-tissue anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy (cases) with those who underwent hysterectomy with apical repair (controls). Composite success was defined as (1) leading edge of prolapse not beyond the hymen and apex not descended > 1/3 total vaginal length; (2) no vaginal bulge symptoms; (3) no prolapse retreatment. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed as well as a Cox regression analysis for time to failure. Results Fifty cases and 97 controls were compared. The median follow-up time was 7.6\xa0months. Operative time was shorter in the hysteropexy group (110.7 vs. 155.9\xa0min, p \u2009<\u20090.001). The composite success was 92% for both cases and controls ( p \u2009=\u20091.000) with no difference in time to surgical failure ( p \u2009=\u20090.183). There were no serious intraoperative complications in the hysteropexy group and six in the control group (3 transfusions, 1 conversion to laparotomy, 1 ureteral injury, 1 cystotomy; p \u2009=\u20090.101). There was no difference in the number of postoperative complications (22.0% vs. 30.9%, p \u2009=\u20090.203). Conclusions For primary uterine prolapse, anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy has similar short-term efficacy compared to hysterectomy with apical repair with shorter operative time and a trend towards fewer serious complications.