Archives of Toxicology | 2021

The influence of the long-term chemical activation of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) on liver carcinogenesis in mice

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) are nuclear receptors that are highly expressed in the liver and activated by numerous chemicals. While CAR activation by its activators, such as phenobarbital (PB), induces hepatocyte proliferation and liver carcinogenesis in rodents, it remains unclear whether PXR activation drives liver cancer. To investigate the influence of PXR activation on liver carcinogenesis, we treated mice with the PXR activator pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile (PCN) with or without PB following tumor initiation with diethylnitrosamine (DEN). After 20\xa0weeks of treatment, preneoplastic lesions detected by immunostaining with an anti-KRT8/18 antibody were observed in PB-treated but not PCN-treated mice, and PCN cotreatment augmented the formation of preneoplastic lesions by PB. After 35\xa0weeks of treatment, macroscopic observations indicated that PB-treated and PB/PCN-cotreated mice had increased numbers of liver tumors compared to control and PCN-treated mice. In the pathological analyses of liver sections, all the mice in the PB and PB/PCN groups developed carcinoma and/or eosinophilic adenoma, but in the PB/PCN group, the multiplicity of carcinoma and eosinophilic adenoma was significantly reduced and the size of carcinoma showed a tendency to decrease. No mouse in the control or PCN-treated group developed such tumors. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) and gene set enrichment analyses in combination with RNA sequencing suggested the increased expression of genes related to epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in mice cotreated with PCN and PB compared to those treated with PB alone. Changes in the hepatic mRNA levels of epithelial marker genes supported the results of the transcriptome analyses. In conclusion, the present results suggest that PXR activation does not promote hepatocarcinogenesis in contrast to CAR and rather attenuates CAR-mediated liver cancer development by suppressing the EMT of liver cancer cells in rodents.

Volume None
Pages 1-14
DOI 10.1007/s00204-020-02955-4
Language English
Journal Archives of Toxicology

Full Text