European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2019

Differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: a direct comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from DWI MRI

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BackgroundFollowing brain cancer treatment, the capacity of anatomical MRI to differentiate neoplastic tissue from treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression) is limited. This study compared apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) with static and dynamic parameters of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression.Patients and methodsForty-eight pretreated high-grade glioma patients with anatomical MRI findings suspicious for progression (median time elapsed since last treatment was 16\xa0weeks) were investigated using DWI and dynamic FET PET. Maximum and mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) as well as dynamic parameters (time-to-peak and slope values) of FET uptake were calculated. For mean ADC calculation, regions-of-interest analyses were performed on ADC maps calculated from DWI coregistered with the contrast-enhanced MR image. Diagnoses were confirmed neuropathologically (21%) or clinicoradiologically. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or Fisher’s exact test for a combinational approach.ResultsTen of 48 patients had treatment-related changes (21%). The diagnostic performance of FET PET was significantly higher (threshold for both TBRmax and TBRmean, 1.95; accuracy, 83%; AUC, 0.89\u2009±\u20090.05; P\u2009<\u20090.001) than that of ADC values (threshold ADC, 1.09\u2009×\u200910−3\xa0mm2/s; accuracy, 69%; AUC, 0.73\u2009±\u20090.09; P\u2009=\u20090.13). The addition of static FET PET parameters to ADC values increased the latter’s accuracy to 89%. The highest accuracy was achieved by combining static and dynamic FET PET parameters (93%). Moreover, in contrast to ADC values, TBRs <1.95 at suspected progression predicted a significantly longer survival (P\u2009=\u20090.01).ConclusionsData suggest that static and dynamic FET PET provide valuable information concerning the differentiation of early treatment-related changes from tumour progression and outperform ADC measurement for this highly relevant clinical question.

Volume 46
Pages 1889-1901
DOI 10.1007/s00259-019-04384-7
Language English
Journal European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Full Text