European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2021

Ultra-low-activity total-body dynamic PET imaging allows equal performance to full-activity PET imaging for investigating kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG in healthy volunteers

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


To investigate the feasibility of ultra-low-activity total-body positron emission tomography (PET) dynamic imaging for quantifying kinetic metrics of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) in normal organs and to verify its clinical relevance with full-activity imaging. Dynamic total-body PET imaging was performed in 20 healthy volunteers, with eight using full activity (3.7 MBq/kg) of 18F-FDG and 12 using 10× activity reduction (0.37 MBq/kg). Image contrast, in terms of liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR), liver-to-blood ratio (LBR), and blood-to-muscle ratio (BMR) of radioactivity concentrations were assessed. A two-tissue compartment model was fitted to the time-to-activity curves in organs based on regions of interest (ROIs) delineation using PMOD, and constant rates (k1, k2, and k3) were generated. Kinetic constants, corresponding coefficients of variance (CoVs), image contrast, radiation dose, prompt counts, and data size were compared between full- and low-activity groups. All constant rates, corresponding CoVs, and image contrast in different organs were comparable with none significant differences between full- and ultra-low-activity groups. PET images in the ultra-low-activity group generated significantly lower effective radiation dose (median, 0.419 vs. 4.886 mSv, P\u2009<\u20090.001), reduced prompt counts (median, 2.79 vs. 55.68 billion, P\u2009<\u20090.001), and smaller data size (median, 71.11 vs. 723.18 GB, P\u2009<\u20090.001). Total-body dynamic PET imaging using 10× reduction of injected activity could achieve relevant kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG and comparable image contrast with full-activity imaging. Activity reduction results in significant decrease of radiation dose and data size, rendering it more acceptable and easier for data reconstruction, transmission, and storage for clinical practice.

Volume 48
Pages 2373 - 2383
DOI 10.1007/s00259-020-05173-3
Language English
Journal European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Full Text