European Radiology | 2021

CNN color-coded difference maps accurately display longitudinal changes in liver MRI-PDFF

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


To assess the feasibility of a CNN-based liver registration algorithm to generate difference maps for visual display of spatiotemporal changes in liver PDFF, without needing manual annotations. This retrospective exploratory study included 25 patients with suspected or confirmed NAFLD, who underwent PDFF-MRI at two time points at our institution. PDFF difference maps were generated by applying a CNN-based liver registration algorithm, then subtracting follow-up from baseline PDFF maps. The difference maps were post-processed by smoothing (5 cm2 round kernel) and applying a categorical color scale. Two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists and one radiology resident independently reviewed difference maps to visually determine segmental PDFF change. Their visual assessment was compared with manual ROI-based measurements of each Couinaud segment and whole liver PDFF using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Inter-reader agreement for visual assessment was calculated (ICC). The mean patient age was 49 years (12 males). Baseline and follow-up PDFF ranged from 2.0 to 35.3% and 3.5 to 32.0%, respectively. PDFF changes ranged from - 20.4 to 14.1%. ICCs against the manual reference exceeded 0.95 for each reader, except for segment 2 (2 readers ICC = 0.86–0.91) and segment 4a (reader 3 ICC = 0.94). Bland-Altman limits of agreement were within 5% across all three readers. Inter-reader agreement for visually assessed PDFF change (whole liver and segmental) was excellent (ICCs > 0.96), except for segment 2 (ICC = 0.93). Visual assessment of liver segmental PDFF changes using a CNN-generated difference map strongly agreed with manual estimates performed by an expert reader and yielded high inter-reader agreement. • Visual assessment of longitudinal changes in quantitative liver MRI can be performed using a CNN-generated difference map and yields strong agreement with manual estimates performed by expert readers.

Volume 31
Pages 5041 - 5049
DOI 10.1007/s00330-020-07649-0
Language English
Journal European Radiology

Full Text