Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2021

Influences on pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Pathologic complete response is associated with longer disease-free survival and better overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. We, therefore, evaluated factors influencing pathologic complete response. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2015 to 2018 at the Saarland University Hospital were included. Patients’ age, tumor stage, tumor biology, genetic mutation, recurrent cancer, discontinuation of chemotherapy, and participation in clinical trials were extracted from electronic medical records. Binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate the influence of these factors on pathologic complete response. Data of 183 patients were included. The median patient’s age was 54 years (22–78). The median interval between diagnosis and onset of chemotherapy was 28 days (14–91); between end of chemotherapy and surgery 28 days (9–57). Sixty-two patients (34%) participated in clinical trials for chemotherapy. A total of 86 patients (47%) achieved pathologic complete response. Patient’s age, genetic mutation, recurrent cancers, or discontinuation of chemotherapy (due to side effects) and time intervals (between diagnosis and onset of chemotherapy, as well as between end of chemotherapy and surgery) did not influence pathologic complete response. Patients with high Ki67, high grading, Her2 positive tumors, as well as patients participating in clinical trials for chemotherapy had a higher chance of having pathologic complete response. Patients with Luminal B tumors had a lower chance for pathologic complete response. Particularly patients with high risk cancer and patients, participating in clinical trials benefit most from chemotherapy. Therefore, breast cancer patients can be encouraged to participate in clinical trials for chemotherapy.

Volume 304
Pages 1065 - 1071
DOI 10.1007/s00404-021-06018-6
Language English
Journal Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Full Text