Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | 2021

One-stitch method vs. traditional method of protective loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: the impact of BMI obesity

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Protective loop ileostomy is an effective diversion measure often used to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the one-stitch method (OM) of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection for BMI obesity patients with rectal cancer compared with the traditional method (TM). The patients diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma cases by preoperative pathology were included in this retrospective study. The subjects underwent protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection from January 2016 to June 2019 in the Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University. The data of loop ileostomy and stoma closure operation were retrieved from the medical cases system of the hospital. 242 patients were included in the present study. In the BMI obese cohort, the OM group showed a shorter operative time both in the loop ileostomy (232.5 vs. 250.0 min, p\u2009=\u20090.04) and stoma closure operation (102.5 vs. 115.0 min, p\u2009=\u20090.001) and a lower peristomal adhesion extent (p\u2009=\u20090.02) and a shorter median postoperative stay (6 vs. 7 days, p\u2009=\u20090.03) during stoma closure operation than that of the TM group. In the TM group, obese cases showed a higher operative time of stoma closure operation (115.0 vs. 95.0, p\u2009<\u20090.001), a higher parastomal hernia rate (p\u2009=\u20090.04), a higher peristomal adhesion extent (p\u2009=\u20090.005) and a longer postoperative stay of stoma closure operation (p\u2009=\u20090.02) compared with the non-obese cases, while in the OM group, no significant differences were observed between the obese and non-obese cases in terms of the above-mentioned factors. The OM exhibited more advantages than TM, notably in BMI obesity patients.

Volume 147
Pages 2709 - 2719
DOI 10.1007/s00432-021-03556-z
Language English
Journal Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Full Text