Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a high worldwide prevalence in adults and children. There is uncertainty regarding medical versus surgical therapy and different surgical techniques. This review assessed outcomes of antireflux surgery versus medical management of GERD in adults and children, robotic versus laparoscopic fundoplication, complete versus partial fundoplication, and minimal versus maximal dissection in pediatric patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (2004–2019) to identify randomized control and non-randomized comparative studies. Two independent reviewers screened for eligibility. Random effects meta-analysis was performed on comparative data. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. From 1473 records, 105 studies were included. Most had high or uncertain risk of bias. Analysis demonstrated that anti-reflux surgery was associated with superior short-term quality of life compared to PPI (Std mean difference\u2009=\u2009\u2009−\u20090.51, 95%CI\u2009\u2009−\u20090.63,\u2009−\u20090.40, I2\u2009=\u20090%) however short-term symptom control was not significantly superior (RR\u2009=\u20090.75, 95%CI\u20090.47, 1.21, I2\u2009=\u200982%). A proportion of patients undergoing operative treatment continue PPI treatment (28%). Robotic and laparoscopic fundoplication outcomes were similar. Compared to total fundoplication, partial fundoplication was associated with higher rates of prolonged PPI usage (RR\u2009=\u20092.06, 95%CI\u20091.08, 3.94, I2\u2009=\u200945%). There was no statistically significant difference for long-term symptom control (RR\u2009=\u20090.94, 95%CI\u20090.85, 1.04, I2\u2009=\u200953%) or long-term dysphagia (RR\u2009=\u20090.73, 95%CI\u20090.52, 1.02, I2\u2009=\u20090%). Ien, minimal dissection during fundoplication was associated with lower reoperation rates than maximal dissection (RR\u2009=\u20090.21, 95%CI\u20090.06, 0.67). The available evidence regarding the optimal treatment of GERD often suffers from high risk of bias. Additional high-quality randomized control trials may further inform surgical decision making in the treatment of GERD.