“Less is better”—always true?

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study is to try to explain what an overtreatment is and which ones are the possible risks related to an excess of simplification in the medical practice, through the description of an emblematic clinical case. Methods In the present article, we report the case of a female patient aged 57 who complained about lower back pain and crural neuralgia and had a lumbar and sacral magnetic resonance imaging performed in the Department of Neuroradiology in Bari showing suspicious repetitive bone lesions; therefore, the patient underwent several medical procedures and laboratory exams which ended with a surgical removal of a left L3–L4 foraminal disc herniation and a bone biopsy. Results When it was finally possible to exclude any other diseases including thyroid neoplasms, a “reassuring” osteoporosis diagnosis has been made since the lesions were likely to be degenerative and the patient underwent menopause 7\xa0years ago. However, the multiplicity of the lesions of the vertebrae and of the pelvic bones as well as their signal could not be ignored, so that a close magnetic resonance imaging follow-up has been recommended. Conclusions The present case is therefore a good example of overtreatment which may lead to delicate questions, investigating any possible mistakes in the diagnosis procedure as well as the role that defensive medicine is playing nowadays on medical procedures and the economic impact that all this can have on our healthcare system. In the end, we may ask ourselves: is “less” better or is “more” always “more?”