Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: long-term outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundThere has been some controversy regarding the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of chronic constipation, due to less positive outcomes and concerns about cost-effectiveness in the long term. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of SNS in patients with chronic constipation.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients who had SNS for chronic constipation in 2008–2017 at our institution. Clinical factors, profile of constipation, physiology studies, and patient satisfaction with SNS therapy were investigated during a follow-up period up to 10\xa0years after the implantation.ResultsTwenty-nine patients [86% female, median age 49 years (range 17–86)] were tested for SNS, and 24 received implants after a positive test phase [median 47 days (range 21–56 days)]. There were 27 bilateral and 2 unilateral implants, in S3 or S4 depending on best response. Mean follow-up was 59\xa0months. Efficacy was considered as a score\u2009>\u20095 (on a scale of 1–10) in general symptom improvement. Nine (37.9%) implanted patients had a satisfaction score\u2009>\u20095. In 6 cases (25%), patient satisfaction was higher than 9. Due to the small sample size, there were no statistically significant variables considered as predictors of response.ConclusionsOur results agree with current studies which describe around a 30% response of SNS for refractory constipation. However, there is a small group of patients highly satisfied with SNS therapy. More studies are needed to better understand this profile and optimize outcomes.