Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare long-term oncological, functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted on PubMed and Cochrane database. Non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) which compared TaTME with LaTME were included. Ten non-randomized studies were identified, including a total of 638 patients (323 TaTME and 315 LaTME). Age, sex, body mass index, neoadjuvant treatment and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) staging of patients in the two groups were comparable in all included studies. The follow-up period was significantly shorter in the TaTME group than in the LaTME group. No significant differences in local (p\u2009=\u20090.71) and distant (p\u2009=\u20090.23) recurrence rate, 2-year disease-free (p\u2009=\u20090.86) and overall (p\u2009=\u20090.25) survival was found. Also, no significant differences in function outcomes and QoL, including the Wexner score (p\u2009=\u20090.48) or the International Prostate Syndrome Score (IPSS) (p\u2009=\u20090.64) were found. However, the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score was significantly higher in the TaTME group (p\u2009=\u20090.04). TaTME and LaTME have similar long-term oncological and functional outcomes as well as QoL. The only exception is higher LARS scores after TaTME. The current data are based mainly on observational studies and further randomized controlled trials are required.