Is immediate treatment necessary for diabetic macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?

Abstract

To assess the treatment benefit of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized eyes for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). In a retrospective multicentre observational study in India, the clinical outcomes of eyes with center-involving DME in vitrectomized eyes for tractional complications of PDR in people with type 2 diabetes with at least 12 months follow-up data were assessed. The DME status and visual acuity outcomes were compared between those who received treatment versus those observed. In the 10-year study period, 45 eyes of 44 patients from 5 tertiary centers in India met the inclusion criteria. Center-involving DME was documented after a mean of 7\u2009±\u20097 months following pars plan vitrectomy (PPV) for tractional complications of PDR. More than half of the (n\u2009=\u200925) eyes were immediately treated for DME, and treatment was deferred for the rest. At one year, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean central subfield thickness in treated (467.9\u2009±\u2009124.8 μm to 367.8\u2009±\u2009143.7 μm; p\u2009<\u20090.001) as well as observed (405.2\u2009±\u2009132.6 μm to 325.6\u2009±\u2009149 μm; p\u2009<\u20090.001) eyes, and the change was comparable (p\u2009=\u20090.574). The change in vision was also comparable (0.12\u2009±\u20090.31 and 0.22\u2009±\u20090.54 Log MAR in the treated and observed group, respectively; p\u2009=\u20090.443). Treatment for pre-existing or new-onset DME after PPV for tractional complications of PDR may be deferred for up to one year because the DME may resolve spontaneously with time.