Comparison between extended transsphenoidal and transcranial surgery for craniopharyngioma: focus on hypothalamic function and obesity

Abstract

Patients suffering from craniopharyngiomas currently have good survival rates, but long-term sequelae, such as development of obesity, worsen their quality of life. Optimal treatment is still controversial and changed during the decades, becoming less aggressive. Transcranial (TC) surgery was the first approach to be used, followed by extended transsphenoidal (eTNS) access. This study aims to compare the two approaches in terms of risk of hypothalamic damage leading to obesity. This is a monocentric retrospective analysis of post-puberal patients treated for primary craniopharyngioma. Postoperative obesity and percentual postsurgical BMI variation were considered proxy for hypothalamic function and used to fit regression models with basal BMI, type of surgery, tumor volume and hypothalamic involvement (anterior vs. anteroposterior). No difference in radicality was observed between the two approaches; eTNS was more effective in ameliorating visual function but was significantly associated with CSF leaks. The TC approach was associated with a higher incidence of diabetes insipidus. Regression analysis showed only tumor volume and basal BMI resulted as independent predictors for both postoperative obesity (respectively, OR 1.15, P\u2009=\u20090.041, and OR 1.57, P\u2009<\u20090.001) and percentual BMI variation (respectively,\u2009+\u20090.92%, P\u2009=\u20090.005, and −\u20091.49%, P\u2009=\u20090.001). Larger lesions portend a higher risk to develop postoperative obesity, independently of hypothalamic involvement. Interestingly, basal BMI is independent of lesional volume and is associated with postoperative obesity, but lesser postoperative BMI variation. The surgical approach does not influence the obesity risk. However, eTNS proves valid in managing large tumors with important hypothalamic invasion.