Performance Evaluation of a Newly Developed MR-Compatible Mobile PET Scanner with Two Detector Layouts

Abstract

Purpose A mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scanner called flexible PET (fxPET), designed to fit existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) system, has been developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, lesion detection rate, and quantitative values of fxPET compared with conventional bismuth germanium oxide (BGO)-based PET/CT without time-of-flight capability. Procedures Fifty-nine patients underwent whole-body (WB) PET/CT scans approximately 1\xa0h after injection of 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose, followed by the fxPET scans with detectors located above and below the patients (layout A) and with detectors closer to the patients (layout B). Two readers assessed the image quality using a 4-point grade for each layout and reached a consensus. We evaluated the differences and/or correlations between fxPET and WB PET/CT, including the lesion detection rates, the standardized uptake value (SUV), the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), the total lesion glycolysis (TLG), the tumor-to-normal liver ratio (TLR), and the background liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results The image quality of layout B was better than layout A ( p \u2009<\u20090.0001). Of 184 lesions, the detection rate of layout B was significantly higher than WB PET/CT ( p \u2009=\u20090.041), while the detection rate of layout A was comparable to WB PET/CT. The SUVmax/mean/peak were larger, and the MTVs were smaller in fxPET than WB PET/CT, especially in the lesions smaller than 2\xa0cm ( p \u2009<\u20090.01). The SUVmax/mean/peak, the MTVs and the TLGs of fxPET had significant positive correlations with WB PET/CT ( p \u2009<\u20090.0001). The TLRs were significantly larger ( p \u2009<\u20090.0001), but the background SNRs were significantly lower in fxPET than WB PET/CT ( p \u2009<\u20090.05). Conclusions The fxPET system yielded reasonable image quality and quantitative accuracy. Bringing the detectors closer to the patient yielded improved results.