Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the early assessment of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an emerging role to monitoring tumor response?

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the role of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the early detection of patients with locally advanced breast cancer who are more likely to reach a complete pathological response (pCR) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods A single-institution prospective study was performed in patients with histological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, eligible for NAC, and who were to undergo surgery in our Hospital. Imaging examinations with ABVS, HHUS and CE-MRI were performed at diagnosis (basal time) and after 3\xa0months of chemotherapy (middle time). The tumor size of each lesion was measured at the basal and middle times, and the dimensional variation was reported. Based on this, patients were divided dichotomously by the median value, obtaining “good responders” (goodR) versus “poor responders” (poorR). The results were correlated with the histological assessment (pCR versus No-pCR) with the use of the intergroup comparison of categorical data (Fisher s exact test). Result A total of 21 patients were included; 5 obtained a pCR (23%). Both the ABVS and the CE-MRI found all 5 patients with pCR in the group of goodR (10 patients), while none of the poorR (11 patients) obtained a pCR [correlation was statistically significant ( p 0.01)]. In the HHUS, goodR (10 patients) 1 obtained a pCR while in the poorR (11 patients) 4 obtained a pCR [correlation not statistically significant ( p 0.31)]. Conclusions ABVS could be a useful tool, appearing to be more reliable than HHUS, and as accurate as CE-MRI, in early detection of patients who could reach a pCR after NAC.