Comparison of Outcomes After Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion in a Critical Care Resuscitation Unit or a Neurocritical Care Unit

Abstract

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become first-line treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Delay in the interhospital transfer (IHT) of patients from referral hospitals to a comprehensive stroke center is associated with worse outcomes. At our academic tertiary care facility in an urban setting, a neurocritical care and emergency neurology unit (NCCU) receives patients with AIS-LVO from outlying medical facilities. When the NCCU is full, patients with AIS-LVO are initially transferred to a critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU). We were interested in quantifying the numbers of AIS-LVO patients treated in those two units and assessing their outcomes. We hypothesized that the CCRU would facilitate an increase in IHTs and provide care comparable to that delivered by the subspecialty NCCU. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of the medical center’s prospective stroke registry for adult IHT patients undergoing MT between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2017. Primary outcome was time from consultation and request for transfer to arrival (Consult-Arrival). Other outcomes of interest were functional independence, defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score\u2009≤\u20092, and 90-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess association between clinical factors, mortality, and functional independence. Results We analyzed the records of 128 IHT patients: 87 (68%) were admitted to the CCRU, and 41 (32%) to the NCCU. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics (age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography scores [ASPECTS]). The median Consult-Arrival time was shorter for CCRU patients than for the NCCU patients (86 [88‒109] vs 100 [77‒127] [ p\u2009 =\u20090.031]). The 90-day mortality rates (16 vs 30% [ p\u2009 =\u20090.052]) and the rates having a mRS score\u2009≤\u20092 (31 vs 36% [ p\u2009 =\u20090.59]) were not statistically different. Multivariable logistic regression showed that each minute of delay in the Consult-Arrival time was associated with 2.3% increase in the likelihood of death (OR 1.023; 95% CI 1.003‒1.04 [ p\u2009 =\u20090.026]), while high thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was the only factor that was significantly associated with functional independence at 90\xa0days (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.4‒6.4 [ p \u2009=\u20090.006]). Conclusion The CCRU increased AIS-LVO patients’ access to definitive care and reduced their transfer time from outlying medical facilities while achieving outcomes similar to those attained by patients treated in the subspecialty NCCU. We conclude that a resuscitation unit can complement the NCCU to care for patients in the hyperacute phase of AIS-LVO.