The Indian Journal of Pediatrics | 2019

Do All Children with Guillain Barré Syndrome Need Immunotherapy?

 
 
 

Abstract


To the Editor: According to the published guidelines, patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) who have Hughes disability score of 3 (inability to walk >5 m unaided) or more in first 2-wk of illness need immunotherapy [Intra-venous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasma exchange (PE)] [1–3]. Immunotherapy is both expensive and invasive; not widely available also. There is paucity of good quality data on treatment of GBS in children. The adult guidelines may not hold good for children, as many even with higher disability score do improve without immunotherapy [4]. A retrospective review of medical records of 25 children with GBS that were managed in the last 6 mo was done. The mean age was 7.9 (2.5–16) y. Mean duration to nadir of illness was 4.5 (2–14) d. Quadriparesis was commonest presenting symptom in 24 (96%) patients, followed by paraesthesia in 19 (76%), slurred speech in 8 (32%), respiratory difficulty in 6 (24%) and ataxia in 3 (12%). Nerve conduction studies (done in 24 patients) showed axonal pattern in 19 (79.1%) patients and demyelination in 5(20.8%). Intervention in the form of immunotherapy was given to 6 patients (IVIG-4, PE-2) who had respiratory failure, bulbar palsy or rapidly progressive quadriparesis with loss of neck control within 48–72 h. Seventeen were treated symptomatically with physiotherapy and gabapentin. Among them, the Hughes disability score was ≥3 in 76% patients at presentation and in 100% at nadir. One patient was lost to follow-up; 13 out of 16 cases showed complete recovery (Hughes 0/1) [Mean time for recovery-50 (20–90) d]. Two children received immunotherapy despite havingHughes score < 3, because of parental request in the first week of illness. Outcome of these 2 children was similar to non-intervention group (Time to reach Hughes score of 0/1–60 d). In our study, 17 patients who had a Hughes score ≥ 3, who satisfied the criteria for intervention according to the guidelines, were not treated with immunotherapy due to unaffordability but showed good recovery. Of these 17 patients, 8 patients who could sit independently and had nonprogression of disease by 5th–7th day of illness, were managed on OPD basis. So, a diagnosis of GBS does not always warrant IVIG or PE in all cases. Individualization of treatment is necessary specially in low income country like ours. Careful observation of patients for 1–2 wk of illness can avoid immunotherapy in many children. Children with respiratory failure, rapid progression of quadriparesis in 3–5 d, or severe bulbar palsy can be considered for immunotherapy.

Volume 86
Pages 479
DOI 10.1007/s12098-019-02864-0
Language English
Journal The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

Full Text