Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Versus Copper Intrauterine Device: A Prospective Study

Abstract

To compare between postplacental insertion of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus copper intrauterine device regarding expulsion rates, patient satisfaction, complications, and continuation rates. This prospective observational study was conducted on 1100 participants divided in to two groups: group (1) CU-IUD group and group (2) LNG-IUS group where women were assigned for postplacental insertion of either CU-IUD or LNG-IUS, respectively. Follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months postpartum and data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes. No statistical difference between both groups regarding patients’ characteristics, the overall expulsion rate was higher in LNS-IUS group than CU-IUD group; 77 patients (14%) and 50 patients (9%), respectively, (P value\u2009<\u20090.05), odds ratio: 1.63 at CI: (1.12–2.37). No significant difference between the two groups regarding pain intensity, perforation, abnormal uterine bleeding, and clinical endometritis (P\u2009>\u20090.05). Overall satisfaction rate at six months was 478(87%) in the CU-IUD group and 472(85.8%) in the LNS-IUS group (P value\u2009>\u20090.05), odds ratio: 1.1 at CI: (0.78–1.55). Continuation rate at s6 months was comparable between the two groups 485 (88.2%) and 480 (87.3%) in CU-IUD group and LNS-IUS group respectively, (P value\u2009<\u20090.05), odds ratio: 1.09 at CI: (0.76–1.56). The rate of expulsion of LNG-IUS is higher than copper IUD when inserted postplacental, yet the continuation and acceptability rates were comparable between the two groups.