A Q-TWiST Analysis Comparing Nivolumab and Therapy of Investigator’s Choice in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Platinum-Refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Abstract

ObjectivesIn the CheckMate 141 trial (NCT02105636), nivolumab demonstrated survival, health-related quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization benefits vs single-agent therapy of investigator’s choice (IC) (methotrexate, docetaxel or cetuximab) in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). We assessed between-treatment differences in quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST).MethodsSurvival data from CheckMate 141 (nivolumab, n\u2009=\u2009240; IC, n\u2009=\u2009121) was partitioned into toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST), and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with all-cause grade 3–4 adverse events after randomization, before disease progression. TWiST was defined as time not in TOX or REL. REL was defined as time between disease progression and death. Utility values derived from three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire data from CheckMate 141 were used to calculate Q-TWiST as the utility-weighted sum of the mean duration in each health state.ResultsThe between-group difference in Q-TWiST score was 1.23\xa0months (95% confidence interval 1.17–1.29) favoring nivolumab (p\u2009<\u20090.001). The nivolumab group experienced significantly longer mean time in TWiST (3.82 vs 2.78\xa0months) and REL (4.02 vs 3.30\xa0months) compared with the IC group (p\u2009<\u20090.001). Mean time in TOX was lower for nivolumab vs IC (0.30 vs 0.37\xa0months, p\u2009<\u20090.001).ConclusionsIn CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful gains (relative difference\u2009>\u200910%) in quality-adjusted survival vs standard of care in patients with R/M SCCHN.