A Prospective Study Evaluating Sleep Quality and Disorders in Post-ARDS Patients

Abstract

Introduction Critically ill patients are predisposed to developing sleep disorders due to multiple factors like pre-existing sleep disorders, severe acute illness, sleep-altering medical interventions, and the disturbing intensive care unit (ICU) environment. In the current study, a multi-modality approach has been attempted to capture the different aspects of sleep disturbances, including insomnia (using ISI), daytime sleepiness (using ESS), sleep quality (using PSQI), sleep architecture, and SDB (using PSG). Materials and Methods The eligible ARDS survivor patients were updated about the study s design prior to hospital discharge. At admission, data regarding demographic details, clinical history, etiology of ARDS, and PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio at presentation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores was collected. All enrolled patients were evaluated twice (early-within 7 days of admission and late-after 6 weeks of discharge) by the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), Insomnia severity index (ISI), and level 1 PSG. Additionally, ESS questionnaire and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were also recorded in late evaluation. Abnormal sleep was defined if one or more of the following characteristics met: ISI >\u200915, ESS >\u200910, global PSQI >\u20095, AHI ≥\u20095 events/h. Results Thirty patients were recruited out of the total of 88 ARDS patients screened at admission. The median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio and APACHE II scores were 176 (151–191.5) and 14 (14–16), respectively. The median (IQR) duration of stay in the ICU was 10 (7.3–19.5) days. The median RCSQ score in the early and late evaluation was 42 and 69, respectively. The mean ISI score in the early evaluation was 16.67\u2009±\u20094.72, which decreased to 11.70\u2009±\u20095.03 in late evaluation (p\u2009<\u20090.05). ISI score >\u200915 (clinical insomnia) was found in 18 out of 30 subjects (60%) in early evaluation and 11 out of 30 (36%) in late evaluation. During the early evaluation, sleep efficiency was low (median 59.9% and predominantly N1 and N2) which improved in late evaluation (median 80.6%). Of the 30 patients, only 4 had AHI >\u20095 in early evaluation and none in late evaluation. Neither of P/F ratio, SOFA, and APACHE II scores did correlate with ICU events in the early and late evaluations. Regression analysis showed subjects with ICU stay more than 10 days, duration of IMV more than 7 days, Fentanyl more than 7 mg, duration of sedative use more than 7 days was independently associated with poor objective sleep quality (low sleep efficiency, low TST and high arousal index) during the early and late evaluations after ICU discharge compared to counterparts (p value <\u20090.05). Conclusion We conclude that sleep quality in ARDS survivors was poor within 7 days of ICU discharge, characterized by severe disruption of sleep architecture and sleep-disordered breathing. After 6 weeks of ICU discharge sleep quality showed significant improvement in the N3 stage and AHI, however persistent insomnia was observed even at 6 weeks. Therefore, prior identification of risk factors and early diagnosis of sleep quality disorders in post-ARDS patients is essential.