The Impact of Preconceptional Hysterosalpingography with Oil-based Contrast on Maternal and Neonatal Iodine Status

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of preconceptional exposure to oil-based iodinated contrast in the hysterosalpingography (HSG) on pregnant women and their offspring’s iodine status, thyroid function, and the outcomes of pregnancy. A cross-sectional evaluation of iodine status was performed on pregnant women with the preconceptional experience of ethiodized-oil HSG. For those found to have iodine excess (with serum iodine concentration (SIC) > 92 μg/L), a prospective follow-up was conducted until termination of the pregnancy or 1 week postpartum. Among 70 of 425 pregnant women with preconceptional ethiodized-oil HSG, iodine excess was initially confirmed in 38 (54.3%), with an elevated SIC (294.00 μg/L [142.00, 123.20]) and urinary iodine-to-creatinine ratio (UI/Cr) (830.00 μg/g Cr [437.50, 255.30]), both higher than the normative data (P = 0.000, P = 0.000). Subsequent follow-up in pregnancy showed a downward trend in both SIC and UI/Cr. Thirty-four women delivered healthy neonates at full term, though the other 4 cases of premature birth, abnormal fetal karyotype, spontaneous abortion, and neonatal cardiac defect were reported. After delivery, the iodine concentration in maternal breast milk and neonatal urine was 584.50 μg/L [328.50, 1507.50] and 424.00 μg/L [277.00, 657.50], respectively, both higher than normative data (P = 0.001, P = 0.015). For thyroid evaluation, 25 cases (65.79%) of clinical or subclinical hypothyroidism and 2 cases (5.26%) of thyrotoxicosis were confirmed in women with iodine excess. Neither goiter nor thyroid dysfunction was detected in any offspring. Preconceptional exposure to oil-based contrast in HSG might exert a far-reaching impact on maternal and offspring iodine status, and tend to result in increased risk of maternal thyroid dysfunction.