Posterior quadratus lumborum versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\nWe aimed to compare the analgesic effects of both posterior (type 2) Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) compared to spinal anesthesia alone for postoperative pain management in inguinal hernia repair.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study enrolled 63 patients scheduled for open inguinal hernia repair. The eligibility criteria were undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair surgery, having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III, and not suffering from any chronic pain condition. Group S patients received spinal anesthetics and no additional analgesic treatments. Group T patients received TAPB, and Group Q patients received QLB as analgesic technique in addition to spinal anesthetics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe pain scores at 6 hours (VAS 6) and 24\u202fhours (VAS 24) were significantly different between groups (p\u202f<\u202f0.01). Additionally, the sensory and motor block levels were significantly different between groups (p\u202f<\u202f0.05). Multiple comparison tests showed that patients in Group Q had significantly higher sensory and motor block levels (p\u202f<\u202f0.01 compared with Group S; p\u202f<\u202f0.05 compared with Group T). Opioid consumption was significantly different between Groups Q and S (p\u202f<\u202f0.01) after surgery.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings show that both blocks are similarly effective for the management of postoperative pain compared to spinal anesthesia alone for inguinal hernia repair. We found that QLB resulted in a significant cranial spread compared to TAPB. Opioid consumption in QLB was significantly lower than that in controls but similar to that in TAPB.