Radiotherapy practices in postoperative endometrial cancer: A survey of the ABS membership.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nThis survey aimed to document the current practice patterns of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), including vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVB) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in the management of patients with endometrial cancer.\n\n\nMETHODS AND MATERIALS\nA 30-item, multiple choice survey querying RT prescribing practices and planning techniques was distributed electronically to American Brachytherapy Society members in December\xa02018.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSeventy-five surveys from 62 centers were completed. Eighty-nine percent of respondents practiced within the USA or Canada. Most (79%) respondents indicated a preference for recommending adjuvant VVB alone in FIGO Stage IB, Grade 2 margin and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) negative disease. For FIGO Stage IB, Grade 3, LVSI-positive disease, most respondents preferred incorporating EBRT either alone (33%) or with VVB (28%). For IIIC1, margin positive disease, VVB in addition to EBRT was most commonly recommended (75%). When planning adjuvant EBRT, 49% utilized CT simulation with both bladder full and empty. Internal target volume was utilized by 53%. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (53%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (19%) were commonly used planning techniques. The most common dose prescription was 45\xa0Gy in 25 fractions (57%). When treating with VVB, 49% determined applicator size at the time of brachytherapy. Sixty-four percent planned treatments based on CT imaging with the applicator in situ and 33% repeated CT imaging before each subsequent fraction. The most common prescription was 21\xa0Gy in three fractions prescribed to 0.5\xa0cm depth (43%).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study identified variability in treatment recommendations and in both EBRT and VVB simulation and planning processes in postoperative endometrial cancer.