Ventilation effectiveness of uniform and non-uniform perforated duct diffusers at office room

Abstract

Abstract Half of the energy usages in buildings is due to HVAC systems, and the efficiency of the subsections plays an essential role in the evaluation of the total energy consumption. Previous works on ventilation systems using perforated duct diffusers (PDDs) were mainly concentrated on the calculation of the thermal comfort indices, while their energy consumption and ventilation effectiveness were omitted. In this paper, a mixed experimental-numerical method has been developed to evaluate the real efficiency of PDDs with different perforation patterns. So, an office room facility is used for the full-scale experiments and the validation of the numerical simulations. Incidentally, five RANS models have been benchmarked to highlight the most accurate numerical model for this specific application. As a result, a k-e Realizable turbulence model with 4.3 million mesh elements has been preferred over the tested two-equation turbulence models to determine the diffuser parameters like age of air, terminal velocities, air-change effectiveness, and air exchange efficiency. Within this model, the required outdoor airflow for four types of PDDs has been calculated following the ASHRAE standard procedure. The discrepancy of the real efficiency and the calculated value for the nearest application in the standards shows that the performance of PDDs is underestimated, and they require lower airflow in reality. Later, it is shown that for the systems using PDDs, the required airflow and energy consumption decrease by up to 18.4%, and a more uniform air distribution is achieved using a non-uniform perforation pattern.