Chemical Geology | 2019

A comparison of bulk versus laser ablation trace element analyses in banded iron formations: Insights into the mechanisms leading to compositional variability

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Abstract Banded iron formations (BIF) represent one of the few chemical sedimentary archives available for exploring the redox state of the Precambrian atmosphere-ocean system and the marine availability of biologically critical trace nutrients through time. Temporal records compiled for a number of trace elements show a relatively wide spread in concentrations spanning several orders of magnitude within a single deposit. It has been suggested that this spread is present in both bulk rock digestion and laser ablation data, however, the comparability of data from the two methods has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we provide a statistical assessment of how comparable laser ablation data of individual BIF hematite and magnetite grains are to one another, as well as how closely averages of laser ablation data approximate bulk rock values. To do so, we use (laser ablation)-high resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ((LA)-HR-ICP-MS) data from 14 BIF slabs and corresponding powders that span four different formations. We focus in particular on BIF from the ≥3.75\u202fGa Nuvvuagittuq Supracrustal Belt (Quebec, Canada) and multiple BIF deposits of the 2.6–2.45\u202fGa Hamersley Group (North Western Australia), representing deposits separated by over a billion years and of differing metamorphic grade. The scaling between selected transition metals is also evaluated in light of expectations for possible delivery mechanisms of trace elements from seawater to BIF precursor sediments – the adsorption to hydrous ferric oxides, biological vectors, and detrital influence. Our findings show that average trace element concentrations between bulk versus laser ablation data typically vary within an order of magnitude. Furthermore, reproducibility between the two methods appears to be independent of formation age, metamorphic grade, or depositional setting. These findings underscore the overall fidelity of the BIF record at capturing seawater compositional signatures at various scales. We demonstrate that evaluations of ancient seawater chemistry using the BIF record are best served by a combined approach utilizing both bulk rock and laser ablation data, as bulk methods offer the most conservative proxy data for ancient seawater composition but may mask significant enrichments or depletions that are detectable at the grain-scale by laser ablation.

Volume 506
Pages 197-224
DOI 10.1016/J.CHEMGEO.2018.12.036
Language English
Journal Chemical Geology

Full Text