Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta | 2019

Precise determination of equilibrium sulfur isotope effects during volatilization and deprotonation of dissolved H2S

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Sulfide (H_2S, HS^−, and S^(2−)) is ubiquitous in marine porewaters as a result of microbial sulfate reduction, constituting the reductive end of the biogeochemical sulfur cycle. Stable isotopes have been widely used to constrain the sulfur cycle, because the redox transformations of sulfur compounds, such as microbial sulfate reduction, often exhibit sizable kinetic isotope effects. In contrast to sulfate ion (SO_4^(2−)), the most abundant form of dissolved sulfur in seawater, H2S is volatile and also deprotonated at near neutral pH. Equilibrium isotope partitioning between sulfide species can therefore overlap with kinetic isotope effects during reactions involving sulfide as either reactant or intermediate. Previous experimental attempts to measure equilibrium fractionation between H_2S and HS− have reached differing results, likely due to solutions of widely varying ionic strength. In this study, we measured the sulfur isotope fractionation between total dissolved sulfide and gaseous H2S at 20.6\u202f±\u202f0.5\u202f°C over the pH range from 2 to 8, and calculated the equilibrium isotope effects associated with deprotonation of dissolved H_2S. By using dilute solutions of Na2S, made possible by the improved sensitivity of mass spectrometric techniques, uncertainty in the first dissociation constant of H2S due to ionic strength could be better controlled. This in turn allowed us to close sulfur isotope mass balance for our experiments and increase the accuracy of the estimated fractionation factor. At equilibrium, aqueous H2S was enriched in ^(34)S by 0.7‰ and 3.1‰ relative to gaseous H_2S and aqueous HS−, respectively. The estimated fractionation between aqueous H_2S and HS^− lies between two earlier experimental reports, but agrees within the uncertainty of the measurements with a recent theoretical calculation.

Volume 248
Pages 242-251
DOI 10.1016/J.GCA.2019.01.016
Language English
Journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Full Text