A Case of Successful Ketamine Treatment after ECT Failure in a patient with Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract

Introduction Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has long been a treatment modality of choice for treatment resistant depression. It remains one of the most effective treatments in psychiatry for a multitude of diseases. However, if patients fail ECT there is a lack of robust options for alternative treatments. This case describes a patient who was initially treated with ECT with no response after several treatments and subsequently transitioned to IV ketamine. Once started on ketamine patient showed a significnat improvement in his depressive symptoms and was able to be discharged from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Mr. X is a 70 year old male with a history of major depressive disorder and three prior suicide attempts. He had multiple recent life stressors, including a spouse diagnosed with cancer and being unable to work after back surgery which significantly contributed to his depression. He was admitted to the psychiatric hospital after an attempted overdose. He was started on escitalopram and buproprion XL, which were titrated to max doses throughout his hospitalization. Given his history of incomplete response with medication, his severe depression, and his high suicide risk, aggressive treatment was warranted. ECT was initiated and he underwent 5 treatments of right unilateral, 2 treatments of bifrontal, and 1 treatment of bitemporal. Throughout the course of ECT he had a lack of seizures despite flumazenil, hyperventilation, various induction agents (including ketamine) and pharmacology. During that time he was not getting out of bed, reporting consistently depressed mood, amotivated, and apathetic. He also began noticing some increased cognitive difficulties with the bifrontal and bitemporal ECT treatments. He ultimately was deemed an ECT failure after 8 treatments with no response. Given his continued depression and failure of ECT, it was decided to attempt IV ketamine infusions as the next intervention for his depression. Methods A literature review was conducted searching for Ketamine vs ECT treatment for depression and suicidality using MESH terms of (Depression) AND (Suicidal behavior) AND (Electroconvulsive therapy OR Electroshock therapy OR Shock therapy OR Electroshock OR Shock treatment OR Convulsive therapy OR Electric shock therapy OR Electric Convulsive therapy OR ECT) AND Ketamine and (Depression) AND (Suicidality) AND (Electroconvulsive therapy OR Electroshock therapy OR Shock therapy OR Electroshock OR Shock treatment OR Convulsive therapy OR Electric shock therapy OR Electric Convulsive therapy OR ECT) AND Ketamine. Additional literature regarding Ketamine for treatment resistant depression was searched for using MESH terms of (Ketamine OR CI-581 OR CI 581 OR CI581 OR Ketalar OR Ketaset OR Ketanest OR Calipsol OR Kalipsol OR Calypsol) AND (therapy OR medical plan OR treatment OR regimen) AND (treatment resistant depression OR therapy resistant depression OR TRD OR refractory depression). Results After initiation of ketamine Mr. X noticed an immediate improvement. He was given 3 total treatments while inpatient with significant clinical improvment noted after each treatment. He was noted to be more engaged, had improved eye contact, and was reporting improvment in his mood. He was also more active, and was noted to be consistently out of bed ambulating with his walker. After the 3 treatments inpatient he was deemed psychiatrically stable for discharge with the plan to continue an acute course of treatment post discharge. He received 2 more treatments after discharge as an outpatient before ultimately being lost to follow up. Electroconvulsive Therapy continues to show a robust response rate of approximately 80%, with remission in about 75% of cases. Even with these response rates, there is a significant patient population that will not respond to ECT. Research has shown that ketamine can have an immediate response of up to or greater than 70% of patietns within the 24\u2009hours post-infusion. Duration of response is varied, though has been found to be present in about 50–70% of patients. However, there has not been significant published research looking into response to ketamine post ECT failure. Conclusions Mr. X is a prime example of the ongoing difficulties in treating patients with treatment resistant depression who do not respond to ECT. This case shows that after ECT failure it is appropriate to attempt treatment with ketamine barring the patient having any contraindications for treatment. Given that there is little published data regarding the response of patients who have failed ECT but subsequently respond to ketamine infusions, this case is an attempt to add to the literature in that regard. Funding None