Incidence and Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the New International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Criteria in Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES\nAt 1 Canadian university hospital, pregnant women were routinely screened for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Diagnostic plasma glucose thresholds were as follows: fasting: ≥5.3 mmol/L, 1 h: ≥10.6 mmol/L and 2 h: ≥9.0 mmol/L. In 2015, diagnostic thresholds were reduced to those recommended by the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) as follows: fasting: ≥5.1 mmol/L, 1 h: ≥10.0 mmol/L and 2 h: ≥8.5 mmol/L. However, subsequent Diabetes Canada guidelines state that further evidence is required before recommending those thresholds. Our objectives were to compare pregnancy outcomes of all pregnant women who underwent a 75-g OGTT before and after the adoption of the IADPSG criteria.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPregnancy outcomes of all women (N=2,830) that had a pregnancy OGTT at the Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont between July 1, 2014 and March 1, 2015 (pre-IADPSG group) were compared with women who were screened between March 1, 2015 and January 1, 2016 (post-IADPSG group). Medical files were reviewed to compare outcomes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWomen in the post-IADPSG group had a higher early body mass index (26.3 vs 25.5 kg/m2, p=0.01) and more chronic hypertension (3.7% vs 1.2%, p<0.0001), respectively. OGTT results were similar, but rates of GDM were 10.8% (141 of 1,295) in the pre-IADPSG group and 17.6% (271 of 1,535) in the post-IADPSG group. In the post-IADPSG group, pre-eclampsia rates were lower (1.0% vs 2.2%, p=0.021), as was labour induction (25.6% vs 32.8%, p<0.0001) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (4.8% vs 8.5%, p<0.001), respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAdopting IADPSG criteria for GDM improved pregnancy outcomes in our obstetric population.