Journal of Cleaner Production | 2021

Carbon footprint and water use of alkali-activated and hybrid cement mortars

 
 
 
 

Abstract


Abstract Cement industry consumes large amounts of water, energy and it is one of the main sources of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Hence, addressing these environmental constraints leads to a search for alternative mortars to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) replacing the clinker by industrial by-products, such as blast furnace slag and/or fly ash. In this context, alkaline activated materials (AAM) show good mechanical properties comparable to OPC. However, AAM present durability problems against leaching phenomena, and workability problems because of the use of alkaline solutions. Therefore, other alternatives as the hybrid materials (HM) are receiving greater attention. In order to determine if the mechanical properties of hybrid and alkali-activated mortars are indeed comparable to those from Ordinary Portland Cements (OPC), this paper first examines the compressive strength and porosity of an AAM case study from slag and two HM systems, both from slag and fly ash. Moreover, since very little is known about their environmental impacts in terms on water use and carbon footprint they were calculated through the Life Cycle Assessment methodology and compared to those of OPC. Results revealed that the assessed AAM and two HM case studies obtained mechanical properties comparable to those for OPC. The AAM obtained −406.02\xa0kg CO2/m3 while for the hybrids the carbon footprints were −253.26\xa0kg CO2/m3 (HM from slag) and −253.27\xa0kg CO2/m3 (HM from fly ash), proving that partial or total substitution of cement by waste in mortars reduces the carbon footprint of OPC more than 100%. In terms on water footprint, more than a 40% reduction in water use is obtained if HM are used instead of OPC supporting the idea that HM achieve good balance between carbon footprint and water use reductions.

Volume 319
Pages 128653
DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128653
Language English
Journal Journal of Cleaner Production

Full Text