Geochemistry, zircon U-Pb and Lu-Hf systematics of high-grade metasedimentary sequences from the South Muya block (northeastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt): Reconnaissance of polymetamorphism and accretion of Neoproterozoic exotic blocks in southern Siberia

Abstract

Abstract High-grade metasedimentary rocks of the South Muya block (Baikal-Muya Foldbelt) have been studied with respect to whole-rock elemental and Nd isotopic compositions, as well as the U-Pb and Lu-Hf systematics of detrital zircon and in-situ grown metamorphic grains in order to reveal the initial source provenance for sedimentation and the age of major metamorphic modification. Based predominantly on trace-elemental compositions, the sedimentary protolith is most likely a poorly sorted and immature greywacke, such as those formed in island arc or active continental margin settings. The island arc-related chemical signature coupled with zircon U-Pb age data supports a Neoproterozoic (>760\u202fMa) sedimentation age, whereas Nd-Hf isotope data of precursor sediments are linked to a relatively immature Tonian (∼940–780\u202fMa) continental arc involving Paleoproterozoic crustal basement. The limited provenance information and metamorphic history of the Muya block suggests it was exotic to Siberia and originally related to another continent, e.g. – subduction-accretion complexes of South China. The polyphase metasediments experienced high-grade metamorphism in the Tonian during the 764–754\u202fMa arc accretion to an enigmatic continental block and then in the Ediacaran during the 622–608\u202fMa accretion of the Baikal-Muya belt to the arc situated at the southern Siberia margin. Metamorphic overprinting during the introduction of supracrustal rocks to deeper-crustal levels led to protracted recrystallization of primary igneous zircon population and growth of new granulite-facies grains that did not involve notable juvenile input. Tonian sedimentary provenance and two metamorphic events suggest a protracted evolution for the Baikal-Muya belt associated with the formation of precursor complexes beyond the southern margin of Siberia and their later accretion to Late Cryogenian – Ediacarian arc complexes of the southern Siberian, which proceeded only after the opening of the Paleoasian Ocean (670–630\u202fMa).