Academic radiology | 2019

Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Ischemic Heart Disease by PET/MRI: Comparison of Left Ventricular Perfusion, Hibernation, and Scar Burden.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES\nHybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) is a novel imaging technology that enables a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare simultaneously acquired viability parameters from MRI and PET to determine complementary and redundant information.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThirty-nine patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) underwent cardiac PET-MR for myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and PET, including a dynamic dual-tracer acquisition of [13N]ammonia ([13N]NH3)/[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), were performed simultaneously. Allocation, extent, and transmural degree of left ventricular (LV) scars were measured from LGE. Perfusion, viability, and hibernation were assessed by PET.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA comparison of scar location revealed six more areas of infarction on MR than on PET. Mean LV scarring by CMR was 14% (range, 2% to 42%) and 14% (range, 1% to 46%) by PET (CMR vs. PET: p\u202f=\u202f0.9). An intra-individual comparison of scarring showed a good inter-method correlation (r\u202f=\u202f0.7), which was also evident in the subgroup with low ejection fraction (EF) (r\u202f=\u202f0.6). Hibernation and transmural degree of scars showed a moderate to weak correlation (r\u202f=\u202f0.4), which was even worse in the low EF group (r\u202f=\u202f0.1).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn patients with IHD, there was a good correlation between PET and CMR for the LV scar extent using hybrid cardiac PET-MR. The degree of transmural scarring by CMR showed no correlation to PET hibernation. Therefore, cardiac PET-MR might be a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability if used to predict response to cardiac reperfusion strategies.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.021
Language English
Journal Academic radiology

Full Text