American Heart Journal | 2019

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE‐CRT MPP–PHASE II)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. Data from the MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) IDE trial and MORE‐CRT MPP–PHASE I study suggest improved response in subjects in the MPP arm—programmed with wide left ventricular (LV) electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest timing delays of 5 milliseconds (MPP‐AS)—compared with quadripolar biventricular (BiV) pacing. Study design The MORE‐CRT MPP–PHASE II trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to assess the 6‐month impact of MPP programmed to mandated MPP‐AS settings in subjects who do not respond to 6 months of BiV pacing (MPP OFF). Approximately 5,000 subjects with a standard CRT indication will be enrolled and implanted with a quadripolar CRT system (Abbott) capable of delivering MPP. Only BiV pacing is activated at implant. At 6 months, subjects classified as CRT nonresponders (<15% reduction in LV end‐systolic volume) are randomized (1:1) to MPP or continued BiV pacing. The mandated MPP parameters (eg, MPP‐AS) are programmed to subjects randomized to the MPP arm. At 12 months, the 2 groups will be compared to determine if there is a difference in CRT response rate. Conclusions This trial will evaluate whether MPP programmed to mandated MPP‐AS settings improves LV reverse remodeling and clinical response to CRT in patients who fail to respond to 6 months of BiV pacing (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02006069).

Volume 209
Pages 1–8
DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004
Language English
Journal American Heart Journal

Full Text