Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of nasal surgery in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES\nThe aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of nasal surgery in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by comparing the improvement of subjective symptoms and objective metrics before surgery and after 6\xa0months of surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients with the main complaint of nasal congestion combined with habitual snoring who were hospitalized and treated were selected. Patients underwent subjective symptom tests and objective indicator monitoring both before surgery and 6\xa0months after surgery. Comparisons between groups were performed using the independent samples t-test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSubjective scale evaluations demonstrated that nasal congestion, daytime sleepiness, snoring, nose-related symptoms, and sleep symptoms in patients with simple snoring or with OSA were improved after nasal surgery. Additionally, vitality was improved in all groups except for the patients with simple snoring and emotional consequence was improved in patients with simple snoring and mild OSA. Objective evaluations indicated the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), the\xa0thickness of the soft palate, and the maximum cross-sectional area of the sagittal plane of the soft palate decreased after surgery in patients with mild OSA. The lowest blood oxygen concentration (LSaO2) and anteroposterior diameter of the soft palate increased after surgery in patients with mild OSA. The arousal index also significantly decreased in patients with mild and moderate OSA. The nasal cavity volumes (NCVs) and the nasal minimal cross-sectional areas (NMCAs) of all groups showed significant differences after surgery.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nNasal surgery can effectively improve nose and sleep symptoms in patients with simple snoring or with OSA. It can significantly reduce the nasal resistance and increase the ventilation volume.\n\n\nSTATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE\nObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is becoming a global health problem. OSA is associated with several coexisting conditions, reduced health-related quality of life, and impaired work productivity. This study performed nasal surgery on OSA patients with the main complaint of nasal congestion combined with snoring and patients with simple snoring to compare the improvement of subjective symptoms and objective metrics before and after surgery. We found that: (1) symptoms such as nasal congestion, daytime sleepiness or snoring were improved after nasal surgery; (2) the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and arousal index decreased after surgery in patients with OSA; (3) the nasal and oropharyngeal cavity volumes increased after surgery. These findings suggest that patients with OSA or with simple snoring could benefit from nasal surgery.