Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation | 2019
Associations between insurance provider and assistive technology use for computer and electronic devices one year after tetraplegia: Findings from the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE\nTo investigate the association between insurance provider and reported assistive technology (AT) use to access computers and electronic devices one year after sustaining tetraplegia.\n\n\nDESIGN\nMulti-center cross-sectional study.\n\n\nSETTING\nParticipants enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) National Database.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nNot applicable.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\n498 men and women with tetraplegia enrolled in the SCIMS National Database were included in the analysis.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE\nThe primary study outcome was the use of AT when operating a computer or other mobile electronic device. The primary predictor was the subject s principal health insurance provider, which was grouped into the three categories: government (Medicare, Medicaid, and other government), private (private insurance, private funds, and other), and Worker s Compensation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 34.7% of participants reported using AT to access computers and electronic devices. Results of logistic regression analysis revealed sex, injury level, injury completeness, self-perceived health status, and 12-month history of pressure ulcer were all significantly associated with AT use. After adjusting for these factors, participants with Worker s Compensation were more likely to report AT use than individuals with either government or private insurance.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDespite significant technological advances, AT is not readily available to the people that might benefit most from its use. Findings from the present study are the first to shed light on AT funding sources and reveal that individuals with Worker s Compensation are more likely use AT than individuals with either government or private insurance. Additional work focused on AT use and functional outcomes is needed to assess the impact of barriers to use. Collectively, this work may inform insurers of the importance of having AT available for this unique population to potentially improve quality of life and participation.