Brain and Cognition | 2019

The impact of the COMT genotype and cognitive demands on facets of intra-subject variability

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


&NA; Intra‐Subject Variability (ISV), a potential index of catecholaminergic regulation, is elevated in several disorders linked with altered dopamine function. ISV has typically been defined as reaction time standard deviation. However, the ex‐Gaussian and spectral measures capture different aspects and may delineate different underlying sources of ISV; thus reflecting different facets of the construct. We examined the impact of factors associated with dopamine metabolism, namely, Catechol‐O‐Methyltransferase Val158Met (COMT) genotype and Working Memory (WM) and response‐switching on ISV facets in young healthy adults. The Met allele was associated with overall increased variability. The rather exclusive sensitivity of ex‐Gaussian tau to frequencies below 0.025 Hz and the quasi‐periodic structure of particularly slow responses support the interpretation of tau as low frequency fluctuations of neuronal networks. Sigma, by contrast, may reflect neural noise. Regarding cognitive demands, a WM load‐related increase in variability was present for all genotypes and all ISV facets. Contrastingly, ISV facets reacted differently to variations in response‐switching as, across genotypes, sigma was elevated for rare target trials whereas tau was elevated for frequent standard trials, particularly for Met homozygotes. Our findings support the significant role of COMT in regulating behavioural ISV with its facetted structure and presumed underlying neural processes. HighlightsIntra‐Subject Variability (ISV) is linked with dopaminergic function.The Met allele of the COMT genotype is associated with overall elevated ISV.ISV is modulated by Working Memory load across all genotypes.Variations in response‐switching have a differential impact on the ex‐Gaussian ISV facets.The ex‐Gaussian measures tau and sigma may characterize the different neural processing underlying behavioural ISV.

Volume 132
Pages 72-79
DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.03.002
Language English
Journal Brain and Cognition

Full Text