Computed tomography-guided partial-breast brachytherapy using implanted catheters as fiducial markers versus co-registered magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nPartial-breast irradiation (PBI) needs accurate cavity delineation with computed tomography (CT). In perioperative PBI using multicatheter-interstitial brachytherapy (MIB), catheters implanted during surgery were enabled as fiducial markers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also assist delineation with CT.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients receiving MIB-PBI were analyzed. Cavity visualization scores (CVSs) were categorized with CT. With catheter-based delineation (CBD), the relationship between cavity boundaries and catheters were used to contour the tumor bed. Co-registered MRI delineation (CMD) was also performed. The correlation between cavity volume and the excised tissue weight was compared for the two techniques.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe association between CVS and preoperative characteristics in 159 patients showed mammographic breast density (MBD) remained correlated to CVS on multiple regression analyses; CVS\u202f=\u202f5.2-0.61 x MBD (p < 0.0001). In 43 patients, the cavity volumes determined with CBD vs CMD were 12.8\u202f±\u202f6.4 cm3 vs 16.1\u202f±\u202f12.4 cm3 (p < 0.0001), and their plots with excised weights showed the best fitting lines were 0.29\u202fvs 0.48 (p < 0.0001), respectively. The correlation coefficients for CBD vs CMD were 0.65\u202fvs 0.55 (p\u202f=\u202f0.20) in low (CVS 1-3, n\u202f=\u202f27) and 0.72\u202fvs 0.58 (p\u202f=\u202f0.36) in high visualized cavities (CVS 4-5, n\u202f=\u202f16), respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe use of implanted catheters as fiducial markers was associated with smaller cavities and greater correlations with the excised tissue weights than co-registration with MRI. This might be a useful technique, especially for patients with dense breasts on mammography.