Contemporary clinical trials | 2019

Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of WalkIT Arizona: A factorial randomized trial testing adaptive goals and financial reinforcement to increase walking across higher and lower walkable neighborhoods.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Little change over the decades has been seen in adults meeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) guidelines. Numerous individual-level interventions to increase MVPA have been designed, mostly static interventions without consideration for neighborhood context. Recent technologies make adaptive interventions for MVPA feasible. Unlike static interventions, adaptive intervention components (e.g., goal setting) adjust frequently to an individual s performance. Such technologies also allow for more precise delivery of smaller, sooner incentives that may result in greater MVPA than larger, later incentives . Combined, these factors could enhance MVPA adoption. Additionally, a central tenet of ecological models is that MVPA is sensitive to neighborhood environment design; lower-walkable neighborhoods constrain MVPA adoption and maintenance, limiting the effects of individual-level interventions. Higher-walkable neighborhoods are hypothesized to enhance MVPA interventions. Few prospective studies have addressed this premise. This report describes the rationale, design, intervention components, and baseline sample of a study testing individual-level adaptive goal-setting and incentive interventions for MVPA adoption and maintenance over 2\u202fyears among adults from neighborhoods known to vary in neighborhood walkability. We scaled these evidenced-based interventions and tested them against static-goal-setting and delayed-incentive comparisons in a 2\u202f×\u202f2 factorial randomized trial to increase MVPA among 512 healthy insufficiently-active adults. Participants (64.3% female, M age\u202f=\u202f45.5\u202f±\u202f9.1\u202fyears, M BMI\u202f=\u202f33.9\u202f±\u202f7.3\u202fkg/m2, 18.8% Hispanic, 84.0% White) were recruited from May 2016 to May 2018 from block groups ranked on GIS-measured neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status (SES) and classified into four neighborhood types: high walkable/high SES, high walkable/low SES, low walkable/high SES, and low walkable/low SES. Results from this ongoing study will provide evidence for some of the central research questions of ecological models.

Volume 81
Pages \n 87-101\n
DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2019.05.001
Language English
Journal Contemporary clinical trials

Full Text