Contemporary clinical trials | 2021
Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and ticagrelor in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Abstract
AIMS\nTo compare the efficacy and safety of a dual therapy (rivaroxaban and ticagrelor) with a triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin) in Chinese elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).\n\n\nMETHODS\nA total of 106 elderly Chinese patients with NAVF after PCI were randomly divided into a dual therapy group treated with ticagrelor 90\u202fmg twice daily and rivaroxaban 15\u202fmg once daily after PCI, and a triple therapy group treated with aspirin 100\u202fmg and clopidogrel 75\u202fmg once daily combined with the dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist warfarin once daily. The mean follow-up time was 1\u202fyear. The primary endpoint was the composite death rate from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke or stent thrombosis. The safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (a composite value of major, minor and minimal bleeding).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the basic characteristics of the patients. The primary composite endpoint of the dual therapy group after 1\u202fyear was not significantly different from the triple therapy group (16.7% vs 15.2%, P\u202f=\u202f0.86; HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.24), but there was a significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhage (7.4% vs 26.9% P\u202f=\u202f0.01; HR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62-0.83) between the 2 groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn elderly Chinese patients with NVAF undergoing PCI, the efficacy of dual (ticagrelor plus rivaroxaban) treatments was comparable to the triple antithrombotic regime (warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy). The overall incidence of bleeding was significantly reduced with dual treatment compared to the triple treatment regime.