Operating characteristics are needed to properly evaluate the scientific validity of phase I protocols.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nOperating characteristics for proposed clinical trial designs provide insight into performance regarding safety and accuracy, allowing the study team and review entities to determine the design s suitability to achieve the study s proposed objectives. Advances in cancer therapeutics have augmented the needs of early phase clinical trial design. Additionally, advances in research on early-phase trial design have led to the availability of a wide range of methods that show vast improvement over outdated approaches.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThree trials utilizing variations of the 3\u202f+\u202f3 decision rule are discussed. The protocols lacked detail, including operating characteristics and guidance for decision-making that deviated from the 3\u202f+\u202f3 decision rule and MTD determination. We provide a discussion of the statistical issues associated with each design and operating characteristics for the proposed design compared to alternatives better suited to achieve the aims of each trial.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOur results illustrate how operating characteristics inform a design s safety and accuracy. Operating characteristics can unmask poor behavior, such as a high percentage of particiapnts exposed to overly toxic doses, a low probability of correctly identifying the MTD, and inappropriate early study termination.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSelection of early-phase trial design has significant implications on a trial s ability to meet its objectives. Operating characteristics are a necessary component in the design and review of a protocol, determining if the study s objectives can be achieved and documenting the study s scientific validity. Continued use of outdated approaches due to historical acceptance hinders scientific rigor and the effort to move effective agents through the drug development process.