Resuscitation à la Carte: Ethical Concerns about the Practice and Theory of Partial Codes.

Abstract

We describe a request for CPR without chest compressions from a patient s daughter. Requests for partial codes raise numerous clinical concerns including lack of evidence-based effectiveness, risk of medical error, and difficulty in communication. These in turn lead to ethical concerns including a misapplication of respect for patient autonomy, violating the foundational principle of first do no harm , and inconsistency with the tenets of shared decision making. Many requests for partial codes are also based on a conflation of cardiopulmonary arrest and pre-arrest emergencies. We argue physicians have no ethical obligation to honor a request for a partial code and that doing so does not violate respect for patient autonomy. Requests for partial codes should be seen as a request for information about CPR and an invitation to conversation. We also report here the move our health system made to only offer evidence-based code status options and reject those with negligible likelihood for therapeutic benefit. This work included limiting options for code status to Full Code or Do Not Attempt Resuscitation , creating an order set for non-arrest emergencies, and sample language to guide physicians in responding to requests for partial codes. To assist other hospitals or health systems considering this move, we provide the content of the order set for non-arrest emergencies and the sample language guide.