Regional Nodal Irradiation for Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Pathologic Negative Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used for operable breast cancer (BC). Appropriate radiation therapy (RT) fields (ie, whole breast [WB] ± regional nodal irradiation [RNI]) in patients who were clinically node positive (cN1) but convert to pathologically node negative (ypN0) after NAC are unknown and the subject of the accruing NSABP B-51 trial. We sought to compare outcomes between WB RT with or without RNI following breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in cN1, ypN0 women following NAC.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nWe identified all BC patients with cN1, ypN0 who underwent NAC followed by lumpectomy and SLNB between 2006 and 2015 in the National Cancer Database. RNI utilization was evaluated using Cochran-Armitage test. Overall survival between WB RT alone versus WB\xa0+\xa0RNI was compared using Kaplan-Meier with and without propensity score-based weighted adjustment and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom 2006 to 2015, RNI use increased from 48.13% to 62.13% (Pfor trend <.001). The 10-year survival for WB alone versus WB\xa0+\xa0RNI was 83.6% and 79.5%, respectively (P= .14). On MVA analysis, the addition of RNI compared to WB alone was not associated with a survival benefit (WB vs. WB\xa0+\xa0RNI: hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.11, P= .19). Results were unchanged after propensity score-based adjustment.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFor women with cN1 BC who convert to ypN0 following NAC and breast conserving surgery with SLNB alone, more extensive RNI may not provide a long-term survival benefit. Prospective validation via the NSABP B-51 trial will be essential.