Stage and Grade Migration in Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy in a Large German Multicenter Cohort.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nOverdiagnosis and overtherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) treatment should be avoided, which has led to an awareness of the need to decrease treatment in cases of low-risk PCa with radical prostatectomy (RP). Simultaneously, prostate-specific antigen testing has become less popular in the last few years, which has resulted in higher cancer grade and stage at diagnosis. We evaluated stage and grade migration in the disease of patients treated with RP in a large German cohort.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nOverall, 4842 patients undergoing RP between 2000 and 2019 were included. Age, prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy, and pathologic Gleason score as well as clinical and pathologic stage were collected. D Amico risk groups and Gleason score were evaluated over different time points.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe detected a significant grade migration toward higher grade. The proportion of biopsy Gleason sum\xa0≤ 6 dropped from 45.8% to 20.6% between\xa0≤ 2010 and 2017-2019. Further, the proportion of patients with low D Amico risk scores also decreased by almost 50% (20.8% vs 12.2%). Finally, the proportion of non-organ-confined PCa increased over time, and the proportion of postoperative Gleason sum\xa0≤ 6 decreased from 20% to 10% over time.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTaken together, data indicate a significant preoperative grade and stage migration toward disease of higher grade in RP-treated PCa. Between the years 2000 and 2019, the proportion of biopsy Gleason sum\xa0≤ 6 and the proportions of D Amico low risk disease decreased by approximately 50% (respectively, 45% to 20% and 20.8% to 12.2%). This might indicate better patient selection for RP, but might also be a telltale sign of the rising mortality and morbidity of PCa.