Clinical biomechanics | 2021

A biomechanical study of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior long segment fusion with vertebral body augmentation.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Proximal junction kyphosis is a common clinical complication of posterior long-segment spinal fusion and vertebral body augmentation method is one of the effective approaches to prevent it. The purpose of this study was to explore the biomechanical effect of proximal junction kyphosis after posterior long-segment thoracolumbar fusion with different vertebral augmentation schemes using finite element analysis. Methods 3D nonlinear finite element models of T1-L5 spine posterior long-segment T8-L5 thoracolumbar fusion combined with T7, T8 and T7&T8 vertebral bone cement augmentation were constructed from human spine CT data and clinical surgical operation scheme to analyze the von Mises stress in the vertebrae, intervertebral discs pressure and pedicle screws system loads under the flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation motion. Findings Compared with thoracolumbar posterior long-segment fusion model, T7 maximum stress in T7, T8 and T7&T8 vertebrae augmentation models were reduced by 8.64%, 7.17%, 8.51%;0.79%, -3.88%,1.67%;4.02%, 5.30%, 4.27% and 3.18%, 3.06%, -6.38% under the flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation motion. T7/T8 intervertebral disc pressure in T7, T8, T7&T8 vertebral augmentation models were 36.71Mpa,29.78Mpa,36.47Mpa;22.25Mpa,18.35Mpa,22.06Mpa;84.27Mpa,68.17Mpa, 83.89Mpa and 52.23Mpa, 38.78Mpa,52.10Mpa under the same condition. The maximum stress 178.2Mpa of pedicle screws is mainly distributed at the root of screw. Interpretation Thoracolumbar posterior long-segment fusion with proximal double-segment vertebral augmentation should be recommended to prevent proximal junction kyphosis than single-segment augmentation. Simulation results can provide theoretical foundations and assist surgeons in selecting the appropriate operation scheme.

Volume 87
Pages \n 105415\n
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105415
Language English
Journal Clinical biomechanics

Full Text